Saturday, July 30, 2011

NIH Study Finds Homosexuals with Smaller Genitals are Routinely the Submissive Member

Courtesy of Eugene Delgaudio, President, Public Advocate of the United States:
There are times when I come across an outrage perpetrated by the Homosexual Lobby and I don’t know whether to scream out loud over their obscenity or laugh at their stupidity. 
In the midst of the debt ceiling crisis, unbelievable news about the Homosexual Lobby has been revealed. 
Because of their influence, one MILLION of your tax-dollars was spent on a study entitled “The Association between Penis Size and Sexual Health among Men Who Have Sex with Men. 
This study, which was pushed by the Homosexual Lobby’s lapdogs in Congress and ran for five years, was subsidized by the National Institute of Health using your tax-dollars.
Their findings are even more ridiculous. In fact it is very hard to believe this was the result of legitimate academic research at all. 
WARNING: Obscene Content Below 
They found that Homosexuals with smaller genitals are routinely the submissive member in their perverse “relationships”, and that those with larger anatomy were more likely to be “on top.”And you and I are forced to pay for this nonsense. 
You can be sure that your Public Advocate will not let this injustice pass unopposed.
Every day, allies of the Radical Homosexual Agenda use government resources to try to force their perversion upon the public. 
At a time when the Liberals are telling us that the Debt Ceiling must be raised, they’re spending one million dollars studying the size of Homosexual genitals... 
Please call your congressman and Senators right away and tell them that raising the debt ceiling is absolutely unacceptable while this sort of trash remains in the Budget!
Congressional Switchboard: 202-224-3121 (Tell them your state and zipcode)

Here is a link to the full study. The following is the NIH Abstract:

Larger penis size has been equated with a symbol of power, stamina, masculinity, and social status. Yet, there has been little research among men who have sex with men assessing the association between penis size and social-sexual health. Survey data from a diverse sample of 1,065 men who have sex with men were used to explore the association between perceived penis size and a variety of psychosocial outcomes. Seven percent of men felt their penis was “below average,” 53.9% “average,” and 35.5% “above average.” Penis size was positively related to satisfaction with size and inversely related to lying about penis size (all p < .01). Size was unrelated to condom use, frequency of sex partners, HIV status, or recent diagnoses of HBV, HCV, gonorrhea/Chlamydia/urinary tract infections, and syphilis. Men with above average penises were more likely to report HPV and HSV-2 (Fisher’s exact p ≤ .05). Men with below average penises were significantly more likely to identify as “bottoms” (anal receptive) and men with above average penises were significantly more likely to identify as tops (anal insertive). Finally, men with below average penises fared significantly worse than other men on three measures of psychosocial adjustment. Though most men felt their penis size was average, many fell outside this “norm.” The disproportionate number of viral skin-to-skin STIs (HSV-2 and HPV) suggest size may play a role in condom slippage/breakage. Further, size played a significant role in sexual positioning and psychosocial adjustment. These data highlight the need to better understand the real individual-level consequences of living in a penis-centered society. [My emphasis]

So gay men live in a penis-centered society. How profound!

No comments:

Post a Comment